US Housing Crisis: Why Deregulation Won't Be the Magic Bullet
The idea that loosening regulations on construction will magically solve the US housing crisis is a misguided one. President Donald Trump's stance on this issue reflects a broader misconception about the nature of the problem and its solution.
Critics argue that rising income inequality, driven by concentration in high-income jobs, has led to bidding up housing prices beyond reach for lower-paid workers. This phenomenon is not unique to any particular city or region but rather a nationwide trend. Research suggests that average incomes across urban America have outpaced wages of non-college-educated workers, exacerbating the crisis.
One potential solution is to increase the supply of affordable homes. However, studies indicate that deregulation alone may not achieve this goal at an adequate scale and speed. For example, relaxing zoning rules could lead to higher land costs and construction expenses, offsetting any gains from increased development.
The recent study on US housing prices found that they have largely followed average incomes, rather than stricter regulations. While it is true that some cities with lax zoning laws, such as Houston, have experienced significant rent increases, these rises are more closely tied to rising wages among highly educated workers than to the regulatory environment.
To bring down home prices and rents, building more affordable housing is necessary. However, estimates suggest that even a moderate increase in supply would not lead to rapid price reductions. For instance, boosting the housing stock by 1.5% per year could reduce median one-bedroom apartment prices by as little as 0.6% to 4% over time.
Ultimately, addressing the housing crisis requires a more nuanced approach than simply relaxing regulations. This may involve policies like rent control, zoning reform, and targeted subsidies for affordable housing development. While these measures are not without their challenges and potential drawbacks, they represent a more comprehensive strategy for tackling this complex issue.
The idea that loosening regulations on construction will magically solve the US housing crisis is a misguided one. President Donald Trump's stance on this issue reflects a broader misconception about the nature of the problem and its solution.
Critics argue that rising income inequality, driven by concentration in high-income jobs, has led to bidding up housing prices beyond reach for lower-paid workers. This phenomenon is not unique to any particular city or region but rather a nationwide trend. Research suggests that average incomes across urban America have outpaced wages of non-college-educated workers, exacerbating the crisis.
One potential solution is to increase the supply of affordable homes. However, studies indicate that deregulation alone may not achieve this goal at an adequate scale and speed. For example, relaxing zoning rules could lead to higher land costs and construction expenses, offsetting any gains from increased development.
The recent study on US housing prices found that they have largely followed average incomes, rather than stricter regulations. While it is true that some cities with lax zoning laws, such as Houston, have experienced significant rent increases, these rises are more closely tied to rising wages among highly educated workers than to the regulatory environment.
To bring down home prices and rents, building more affordable housing is necessary. However, estimates suggest that even a moderate increase in supply would not lead to rapid price reductions. For instance, boosting the housing stock by 1.5% per year could reduce median one-bedroom apartment prices by as little as 0.6% to 4% over time.
Ultimately, addressing the housing crisis requires a more nuanced approach than simply relaxing regulations. This may involve policies like rent control, zoning reform, and targeted subsidies for affordable housing development. While these measures are not without their challenges and potential drawbacks, they represent a more comprehensive strategy for tackling this complex issue.