The Beauty Industry's 'Green' Ambitions Are a Patchwork at Best, Falling Short of Expectations.
The escalating climate crisis is forcing many people to reassess their purchasing habits, and the $500 billion global beauty industry is no exception. In response to growing consumer demands for sustainability, brands have set ambitious environmental goals, including reducing single-use plastics, providing recyclable and reusable packaging, and increasing transparency around product ingredients.
However, despite these efforts, consumers continue to struggle to understand the sustainability credentials of many products. Industry clean-up initiatives have been inconsistent, and collective goal-setting, global strategy, and standardized regulations are lacking. This lack of standardization has led to "greenwashing," where brands make unsubstantiated sustainability claims.
One of the biggest challenges facing the industry is the use of misleading terms like "clean beauty." The British Beauty Council's CEO, Millie Kendall, warns that such buzzwords are losing traction as consumers become more savvy. Instead, customers need better marketing information and certification standards to guide their purchasing decisions.
The beauty industry's plastic packaging is a significant sustainability challenge, with 95% of its waste thrown away and most of it not recycled. Major brands like L'Oréal and Estee Lauder have set targets for using post-consumer recycled (PCR) plastic, but progress has been slow. PCR plastic is more expensive than virgin plastic, making it difficult to source and increasing demand.
Beauty retailers also play a crucial role in promoting sustainability, but many are inconsistent in their standards. Smaller businesses, on the other hand, are often more agile and responsive to changing consumer demands.
Governments and multinationals can set regulations and baseline standards for brands to operate from when making sustainability claims. However, market leadership is key, and it's ultimately up to companies like Credo Beauty and individual consumers to drive change through collective advocacy and initiative. Without bold regulations or global standards on sustainability practices, meaningful climate-conscious change may be elusive.
The patchwork approach to sustainability in the beauty industry highlights the need for greater consistency, transparency, and standardization. As consumers become increasingly environmentally conscious, brands must prioritize genuine sustainability over greenwashing and misleading marketing claims. The future of sustainable beauty depends on it.
The escalating climate crisis is forcing many people to reassess their purchasing habits, and the $500 billion global beauty industry is no exception. In response to growing consumer demands for sustainability, brands have set ambitious environmental goals, including reducing single-use plastics, providing recyclable and reusable packaging, and increasing transparency around product ingredients.
However, despite these efforts, consumers continue to struggle to understand the sustainability credentials of many products. Industry clean-up initiatives have been inconsistent, and collective goal-setting, global strategy, and standardized regulations are lacking. This lack of standardization has led to "greenwashing," where brands make unsubstantiated sustainability claims.
One of the biggest challenges facing the industry is the use of misleading terms like "clean beauty." The British Beauty Council's CEO, Millie Kendall, warns that such buzzwords are losing traction as consumers become more savvy. Instead, customers need better marketing information and certification standards to guide their purchasing decisions.
The beauty industry's plastic packaging is a significant sustainability challenge, with 95% of its waste thrown away and most of it not recycled. Major brands like L'Oréal and Estee Lauder have set targets for using post-consumer recycled (PCR) plastic, but progress has been slow. PCR plastic is more expensive than virgin plastic, making it difficult to source and increasing demand.
Beauty retailers also play a crucial role in promoting sustainability, but many are inconsistent in their standards. Smaller businesses, on the other hand, are often more agile and responsive to changing consumer demands.
Governments and multinationals can set regulations and baseline standards for brands to operate from when making sustainability claims. However, market leadership is key, and it's ultimately up to companies like Credo Beauty and individual consumers to drive change through collective advocacy and initiative. Without bold regulations or global standards on sustainability practices, meaningful climate-conscious change may be elusive.
The patchwork approach to sustainability in the beauty industry highlights the need for greater consistency, transparency, and standardization. As consumers become increasingly environmentally conscious, brands must prioritize genuine sustainability over greenwashing and misleading marketing claims. The future of sustainable beauty depends on it.
But is it really that simple? I mean, think about all these brands making lofty claims about reducing single-use plastics and increasing transparency... but what does that even look like in practice? 
It's like they're checking off boxes on some imaginary sustainability checklist without actually putting in the work. And don't even get me started on "clean beauty" - it's just a marketing term, right? 
I mean, who defines what's clean and what's not? The industry needs to be more honest with themselves and their customers about what they're doing (or not doing). We need to hold these brands accountable for making real changes, not just using green as an excuse to keep selling the same products. 
i mean what's the point of saying a brand is "green" if they're just gonna use more expensive plastic because its recyclable? 
also why do brands have to be the ones to set regulations for themselves when they're not even consistent in their own standards 
smaller businesses are doing some cool stuff but it's gotta be on a bigger scale for us to make a difference 
I think the beauty industry is making progress but not fast enough. We're constantly getting bombarded with eco-friendly terms that don't always mean what they say 
. They need to back up the talk with actions and make it easy for us to make informed choices 
.
.
. And what about smaller businesses? They're the ones who can make real change, but they need support and resources 
.
THEY'RE ALWAYS TALKING ABOUT GOING GREEN BUT IT FEELS LIKE NOTHING IS REALLY CHANGING. I MEAN, COME ON, 95% OF THEIR PLASTIC WASTE DOESN'T EVEN GET RECYCLED?! AND DON'T EVEN GET ME STARTED ON "CLEAN BEAUTY" - IT'S JUST A BUNCH OF BS TERMS THAT MEAN NOTHING TO ANYONE. WE NEED BETTER MARKETING INFO AND CERTIFICATION STANDARDS, NOT JUST SOME BUNCH OF BRANDED SUSTAINABILITY SYMBOLS 
. They're making these huge claims about being eco-friendly but honestly, it's just a bunch of smoke and mirrors. I mean, have you seen those "recyclable" packaging? Give me a break! 
And don't even get me started on the term "clean beauty". It's like they're speaking a different language or something. 
. And what's with all these smaller businesses being so much better than the big brands? Can't they just set some standards already?! 
. Can't we just have a real sustainable beauty industry for once?! 
And don't even get me started on how hard it is for consumers to actually know what's going on behind the scenes - it's like they're being sold a bill of goods 
We need better regulations, more transparency, and standards for what "green" actually means 
and dont even get me started on the term "clean beauty" its just a fancy way of saying "we're gonna charge you more for it 
. L'Oréal sets a target for PCR plastic but nobody knows what that means or how it's being implemented. It feels like a PR stunt instead of actual progress 
.
. Companies need to step up their game and be transparent about what they're doing to reduce waste and increase sustainability. We need real changes, not just PR spin 
.
I've been following some eco-friendly beauty brands for a while now and it's like they're making progress but not fast enough 
I mean, 95% of their waste is not even recyclable?! 
how can we trust them when they say they're doing sustainable if most of that plastic isn't getting recycled? 
it's time for brands to prioritize sustainability over profits 
And yeah, the packaging is a huge problem - I mean, 95% of plastic waste goes to landfills, that's insane 
and btw what's PCR plastic again? is it like special kind of recyclable trash 
. i mean, how many 'eco-friendly' products are really just rebranded versions of their original packaging?