Federal Appeals Court to Reconsider Trump's Troop Deployment in Portland Amid Ongoing Protests
A federal appeals court has agreed to rehear a contentious case regarding President Donald Trump's authority to deploy national guard forces in Portland, Oregon, following a recent ruling that barred the administration from doing so. The ninth circuit court of appeals will now hear arguments on the matter before an 11-judge panel.
The case centers around Trump's decision to mobilize federalized guard members in response to months of protests in the city. However, local officials argue that the situation is under control and does not require military intervention. In contrast, the federal government claims that law enforcement officers at a nearby Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility were under attack.
In defiance of Trump's characterization of Portland as "war-torn," locals have shared videos showcasing the city's vibrant outdoor spaces and thriving food scene. Meanwhile, local authorities are taking steps to address perceived militarization in the city, including planning an Emergency Naked Bike Ride.
The appeals court decision is a significant development in the ongoing legal saga. In December, US District Judge Karin Immergut issued temporary restraining orders that blocked Trump from deploying Oregon national guard troops and prevented him from federalizing the state's militia.
The latest ruling effectively puts these orders back on hold, allowing Trump to maintain command of 200 Oregon National Guard members who were deployed in late September. However, a separate order remains in place, preventing the deployment of additional troops.
With an 11-judge panel set to review both rulings, it is unclear how this decision will impact the ongoing situation in Portland. Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield has welcomed the court's intervention, stating that "the courts are working to hold this administration accountable" and that "the constitution limits the president's power." The attorney general vowed to continue defending Oregon's laws and values as the case moves forward.
The decision sends a clear message: the president cannot deploy the military into US cities unnecessarily. As the matter continues to unfold in the courts, local residents are gearing up for further action, including plans for an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against what they see as unnecessary militarization of their city.
A federal appeals court has agreed to rehear a contentious case regarding President Donald Trump's authority to deploy national guard forces in Portland, Oregon, following a recent ruling that barred the administration from doing so. The ninth circuit court of appeals will now hear arguments on the matter before an 11-judge panel.
The case centers around Trump's decision to mobilize federalized guard members in response to months of protests in the city. However, local officials argue that the situation is under control and does not require military intervention. In contrast, the federal government claims that law enforcement officers at a nearby Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility were under attack.
In defiance of Trump's characterization of Portland as "war-torn," locals have shared videos showcasing the city's vibrant outdoor spaces and thriving food scene. Meanwhile, local authorities are taking steps to address perceived militarization in the city, including planning an Emergency Naked Bike Ride.
The appeals court decision is a significant development in the ongoing legal saga. In December, US District Judge Karin Immergut issued temporary restraining orders that blocked Trump from deploying Oregon national guard troops and prevented him from federalizing the state's militia.
The latest ruling effectively puts these orders back on hold, allowing Trump to maintain command of 200 Oregon National Guard members who were deployed in late September. However, a separate order remains in place, preventing the deployment of additional troops.
With an 11-judge panel set to review both rulings, it is unclear how this decision will impact the ongoing situation in Portland. Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield has welcomed the court's intervention, stating that "the courts are working to hold this administration accountable" and that "the constitution limits the president's power." The attorney general vowed to continue defending Oregon's laws and values as the case moves forward.
The decision sends a clear message: the president cannot deploy the military into US cities unnecessarily. As the matter continues to unfold in the courts, local residents are gearing up for further action, including plans for an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against what they see as unnecessary militarization of their city.