How OpenAI is using GPT-5 Codex to improve the AI tool itself

OpenAI, the company behind popular AI model ChatGPT, has taken a bold step in its quest to create more sophisticated artificial intelligence. The company's latest innovation, Codex, is an AI coding agent that can handle tasks such as writing features, fixing bugs, and proposing pull requests.

Codex is built using OpenAI's own GPT-5 Codex model, which operates as a cloud-based software engineering agent. This means that most of the development work on Codex was done by Codex itself, with the company relying on its AI coding agent to improve and expand its capabilities.

According to Alexander Embiricos, product lead for Codex at OpenAI, "the vast majority of Codex is built by Codex." The model runs in sandboxed environments linked to a user's code repository and can execute multiple tasks in parallel. This allows it to work on a wide range of coding projects, from simple fixes to complex feature development.

One of the most impressive examples of Codex's capabilities was its role in developing OpenAI's Sora Android app. According to Embiricos, the development tool allowed the company to create the app in record time - just 18 days for the initial build and a total of 28 days from start to finish.

However, while Codex has shown tremendous promise, it's not without its challenges. A recent study by METR found that experienced open-source developers were actually 19% slower when using AI tools on complex, mature codebases. But Embiricos argues that these results are not representative of the entire coding landscape and that Codex is still in its early stages.

Despite this, there's no denying that Codex has already had a significant impact on OpenAI's development processes. The company's engineers now use Codex regularly, and even the company's own coders have seen their workflows improved by the AI agent.

But what does the future hold for agents like Codex? Embiricos believes that coding is a key area where these models will excel, providing economic value to developers while also scaling through them. He argues that Codex is not meant to replace human developers but rather to amplify their potential.

As the world of AI continues to evolve, it's clear that OpenAI is at the forefront of this revolution. With Codex leading the charge, we can expect to see even more innovative applications of AI in the coding space.
 
omg can you imagine having an AI agent do your homework for u lol but seriously codex is like the ultimate coding sidekick ๐Ÿค–๐Ÿ’ป it's like having a genius robot that can write features and fix bugs all day long ๐Ÿ“๐Ÿ’ช but i guess the devs who already know what they're doing might be like "yeah no thanks" 19% slower ๐Ÿ˜‚ but hey maybe that's just because they're too used to being awesome ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™‚๏ธ so yeah codex is gonna change the game and make coding way more efficient ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ’ฅ
 
I gotta say, I'm both hyped and worried about this Codex thing ๐Ÿค”. On one hand, it's amazing that they were able to build something like this from scratch using their own GPT-5 model ๐Ÿ’ป. The fact that Codex can write features, fix bugs, and propose pull requests is seriously impressive ๐Ÿคฏ.

But at the same time, I'm a bit skeptical about how sustainable this whole thing is ๐Ÿ™„. I mean, we're talking about AI-generated code here, which can be pretty brittle if it's not tested thoroughly ๐Ÿ”ฅ. And what happens when you have to make changes that require human judgment? That's where I think Codex falls short ๐Ÿ‘Ž.

On the other hand, I do think this is a major step forward for OpenAI and the tech industry as a whole ๐Ÿš€. We're seeing more and more innovation in AI-powered tools, and Codex is just another example of that ๐Ÿ’ธ. I'm excited to see where this technology takes us, but I also want to make sure we're not over-relying on AI to solve our coding problems ๐Ÿค.

Overall, I think Codex is a game-changer, but it's going to take some time to figure out the full implications of it ๐Ÿ’ก.
 
I'm low-key impressed with what they've done with Codex lol... I mean, 18 days for a whole app? That's crazy! But at the same time, I'm not sure if it's all sunshine and rainbows. I've seen those studies where experienced devs are slower with AI tools on complex codebases, so I think there's some truth to that ๐Ÿ˜’.

But on the flip side, if Codex can really help streamline dev workflows and make coding more efficient, then yeah, let's give it a shot! I'm all for innovation in tech. And if OpenAI can make AI coding agents like Codex widely available, we might actually see some real productivity gains in the industry ๐Ÿค–๐Ÿ’ป.

The thing that really gets me is how Codex isn't meant to replace human devs but amplify their potential... that's a total game-changer! We need more of this kind of thinking in tech. So yeah, I'm hyped about what Codex can do and where it'll take us ๐Ÿ‘
 
๐Ÿค– I'm not sure if we're ready for this level of automation in coding yet. Like 19% slower on complex projects? That's a big chunk of time. I think Codex is cool and all, but let's make sure it's not taking jobs away from devs who are actually passionate about their work ๐Ÿ™
 
I'm not entirely convinced about Codex being a game-changer ๐Ÿค”. I mean, it's still an AI model that's relying on its own internal workings to improve and expand its capabilities... sounds like a big circle of AI-ness to me ๐Ÿ˜’. And yeah, the speed and efficiency gains are nice, but at what cost? Are we just trading in our human thinking skills for some fancy algorithms? ๐Ÿค– I'm still waiting to see how this plays out, especially with those studies showing experienced devs being 19% slower when using AI tools... doesn't sit right with me ๐Ÿ˜ฌ. But hey, if it's working for OpenAI's engineers and coders, that's a different story ๐Ÿ‘
 
Codex is straight fire ๐Ÿคฏ I mean, 18 days to build a full Android app? That's insane! But at the same time, I'm like, what about all these devs who use Codex and just end up being slower on complex projects? ๐Ÿ˜ It's def an interesting study. But I think Embiricos makes some legit points about how Codex is meant to amplify human devs' potential not replace them. And that economic value thing? ๐Ÿ’ธ Sounds like a win-win. Can't wait to see what other innovations come out of this! ๐Ÿš€
 
Codex is a total game changer ๐Ÿค–๐Ÿ’ป! I mean, can you imagine having an AI tool that can help with coding tasks like writing features and fixing bugs? It's like having a super smart friend who knows what to do with your code without you even asking. And the fact that it can work on complex projects in no time is just mind blowing โฑ๏ธ.

But at the same time, I'm a bit worried about the impact of AI tools on human developers ๐Ÿค”. If coding is going to be all about working with AI tools like Codex, do we risk losing some of that creative spark and problem-solving skills that humans have? And what happens when these AI models get too good at their job and start replacing us altogether?

I guess the answer lies in how OpenAI approaches this tech. If they're going to use Codex as a tool to augment human developers, not replace them, then I'm all for it ๐Ÿค. Let's see how it plays out, but one thing's for sure - the future of AI is looking bright โœจ.
 
Codex is gonna change the game for devs and companies who need quick coding solutions ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ”ง I'm hyped about how OpenAI is pushing the boundaries with this AI agent. 18 days to build an app? That's insane! ๐Ÿ’ป But yeah, it's not all sunshine and rainbows, the study did show that experienced devs can be slower when using AI tools ๐Ÿค”... but I think Embiricos has a point, Codex is meant to augment human potential, not replace it. The future of coding with AI agents like Codex looks bright, can't wait to see what other innovations come out of this tech ๐Ÿ”ฅ
 
Codex by OpenAI is like a super cool tool for devs ๐Ÿ”ง๐Ÿ’ป. I mean, 18 days to build an app from scratch? That's insane ๐Ÿคฏ! But at the same time, it's also kinda scary thinking about how much code these AI agents can handle. Are we gonna see more and more devs relying on Codex instead of actually writing their own code? ๐Ÿค”

I think that's where Embiricos is right - Codex isn't meant to replace human developers but rather to help us out. It's like having a super smart assistant that can do some of the heavy lifting for you, so you can focus on the creative stuff ๐Ÿ’ก.

But what about all the experienced devs who say they're slower when using AI tools? Do we need to worry that Codex is gonna take over the world ๐Ÿค–? I don't think so - it's just a tool, and like any tool, it's only as good as the person wielding it ๐Ÿ’ช.

Anyway, one thing's for sure - Codex is definitely changing the game in the coding space ๐Ÿš€. And with OpenAI pushing the boundaries of what's possible, I'm excited to see what the future holds ๐Ÿ”ฎ!
 
omg i just think its so cool how codex is basically doing all the work for openai devs ๐Ÿ˜‚ like they're not even coding anymore! its like having a super smart sidekick that helps you write features and fix bugs way faster than humans can ๐Ÿค– but at the same time i can see why some experienced devs might feel slow when using ai tools on complex projects ๐Ÿค” its all about finding the right balance, you know?
 
I'm loving how far Codex has come already! I mean, 18 days to build an Android app? That's insane ๐Ÿ’ฅ! But at the same time, it's a bit concerning that experienced devs are slower when using AI tools on complex codebases ๐Ÿค”. Still, it's all about finding that balance between human creativity and AI efficiency.

I'm all for Codex amplifying the potential of developers, not replacing them ๐Ÿ˜Š. I can already imagine how this tech could help with bug fixes and feature development - game-changer! ๐Ÿ’ป
 
Back
Top