London's Metropolitan police has been working closely with researchers to identify a significant number of people recently arrested and detained in custody centers across the city. A recent study published by the University of Cambridge found that an astonishing half of those arrested over an eight-week period may be walking around with undiagnosed Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and one in 20 individuals could be exhibiting symptoms of autism.
The research, which took place at six London Metropolitan police custody centers, offered informal screening for neurodivergence to detained individuals. The team, led by Prof Sir Simon Baron-Cohen from the Autism Research Centre at Cambridge, believes that better screening could lead to improved support and fairer treatment for those in the criminal justice system.
According to Dr Tanya Procyshyn, a research associate at ARC, "Early identification helps officers interpret behaviors that might otherwise be misunderstood and ensures appropriate support is provided. This approach creates opportunities to divert vulnerable individuals away from the criminal justice process and towards the help they may need."
The study used modified versions of established screening tools for ADHD and autism traits in order to flag potential cases that would require further assessment. The results showed that nearly 71% of those who were eligible to participate in screening agreed to do so, while eight percent already had a diagnosed ADHD condition.
However, what was even more striking was the discovery that over half (50%) of individuals without an existing diagnosis scored above the threshold for possible undiagnosed ADHD. This included 33 individuals with an exceptionally high number of symptoms.
Furthermore, one in four arrested for drug offenses revealed they already had a diagnosed ADHD or positive screening results, possibly due to self-medication with illicit substances. These findings echo previous research suggesting that neurodivergent individuals are often overrepresented in prisons and may struggle with impulse control issues.
This study's findings underscore the need for better support systems and fairer treatment within the criminal justice system. By providing informal screenings, the police can take a crucial step towards helping vulnerable individuals who may have previously been misunderstood or misdiagnosed. As Prof Sir Simon Baron-Cohen emphasizes, "Screening for possible neurodivergence will allow more informed legal decision-making, taking into account cognitive and communicative differences."
The research, which took place at six London Metropolitan police custody centers, offered informal screening for neurodivergence to detained individuals. The team, led by Prof Sir Simon Baron-Cohen from the Autism Research Centre at Cambridge, believes that better screening could lead to improved support and fairer treatment for those in the criminal justice system.
According to Dr Tanya Procyshyn, a research associate at ARC, "Early identification helps officers interpret behaviors that might otherwise be misunderstood and ensures appropriate support is provided. This approach creates opportunities to divert vulnerable individuals away from the criminal justice process and towards the help they may need."
The study used modified versions of established screening tools for ADHD and autism traits in order to flag potential cases that would require further assessment. The results showed that nearly 71% of those who were eligible to participate in screening agreed to do so, while eight percent already had a diagnosed ADHD condition.
However, what was even more striking was the discovery that over half (50%) of individuals without an existing diagnosis scored above the threshold for possible undiagnosed ADHD. This included 33 individuals with an exceptionally high number of symptoms.
Furthermore, one in four arrested for drug offenses revealed they already had a diagnosed ADHD or positive screening results, possibly due to self-medication with illicit substances. These findings echo previous research suggesting that neurodivergent individuals are often overrepresented in prisons and may struggle with impulse control issues.
This study's findings underscore the need for better support systems and fairer treatment within the criminal justice system. By providing informal screenings, the police can take a crucial step towards helping vulnerable individuals who may have previously been misunderstood or misdiagnosed. As Prof Sir Simon Baron-Cohen emphasizes, "Screening for possible neurodivergence will allow more informed legal decision-making, taking into account cognitive and communicative differences."