Tesco has effectively washed its hands of my complaint over damaged car after I used their automated car wash at my local store. The repair bill is estimated at £750, but the supermarket chain refuses to accept liability.
The incident occurred when I took my vehicle for a regular wash at the Tesco superstore in Dumfries and Galloway. However, upon exiting the car wash, I noticed that my tail spoiler had been ripped off and my brake light was no longer functioning. Staff at the store acknowledged how frequently cars are damaged in their automated washes, citing maintenance reports as evidence.
Despite the apparent lack of fault found by Tesco's contracted company, they refused to provide me with a copy of the report, citing "company policy". The supermarket chain has issued an identically worded letter from its solicitors, claiming no defects were found and stating that the disclaimer at the entrance absolves it of liability unless by a fault with the machine.
However, Tesco denies having a blanket policy to reject compensation claims, insisting they consider each case on its merits. Staff allegedly check wash cycles daily, but the car wash I used was reportedly found to be in good working order.
As a result, I am left with two options: claim through my insurer or take the legal route. If I decide to pursue the latter, I must send a letter before action specifying the damages I seek and give Tesco 14 days to respond.
If that fails, I can collate details and photos of the damage, proof of payment for the car wash, and repair quotes, then use Scotland's "simple procedure" to make a claim through the sheriff courts. In England and Wales, it's a similar process involving a county court.
The incident occurred when I took my vehicle for a regular wash at the Tesco superstore in Dumfries and Galloway. However, upon exiting the car wash, I noticed that my tail spoiler had been ripped off and my brake light was no longer functioning. Staff at the store acknowledged how frequently cars are damaged in their automated washes, citing maintenance reports as evidence.
Despite the apparent lack of fault found by Tesco's contracted company, they refused to provide me with a copy of the report, citing "company policy". The supermarket chain has issued an identically worded letter from its solicitors, claiming no defects were found and stating that the disclaimer at the entrance absolves it of liability unless by a fault with the machine.
However, Tesco denies having a blanket policy to reject compensation claims, insisting they consider each case on its merits. Staff allegedly check wash cycles daily, but the car wash I used was reportedly found to be in good working order.
As a result, I am left with two options: claim through my insurer or take the legal route. If I decide to pursue the latter, I must send a letter before action specifying the damages I seek and give Tesco 14 days to respond.
If that fails, I can collate details and photos of the damage, proof of payment for the car wash, and repair quotes, then use Scotland's "simple procedure" to make a claim through the sheriff courts. In England and Wales, it's a similar process involving a county court.