Ryan Murphy's "Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story" is an example of the brand undermining the mission

Ryan Murphy's recent series, "Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story," is a prime example of the brand undermining its own mission to tackle issues of systemic injustice and social critique. By focusing on the sensationalized aspects of Dahmer's crimes and utilizing Evan Peters in a starring role as the titular character, Murphy's team veers away from their intended goal of shedding light on the dark underbelly of American society.

The series has all the makings of a thought-provoking drama: it delves into the lives of marginalized communities, highlights the failures of law enforcement, and critiques the societal ills that contribute to these injustices. However, in its attempt to humanize Dahmer, Murphy's team finds itself walking a fine line between shedding light on the atrocities committed by this monster and perpetuating his mythos.

The show's central message – that Dahmer's crimes were not just gruesome but also a metaphor for the societal ills of America – is telegraphed through various episodes and characters. However, it is undermined by the emphasis placed on Peters' portrayal of Dahmer as a sympathetic figure, rather than focusing on the real-life victims and their families.

A prime example of this disconnect can be seen in the way the show's writers employ Peters to give us what we've come to expect from his performances: a star-making role. This comes at the expense of the actual message the series aims to convey – that Dahmer was a product of societal ills, and his actions were not just monstrous but also symptomatic of a larger problem.

Furthermore, this emphasis on Peters' performance serves as a reminder of how the true crime genre has conditioned us to consume tragedy by turning murderers, victims, and loved ones into characters. By slapping down Glenda's (Niecy Nash) assertion that she is not watching Dahmer for entertainment purposes but rather because he lived next door, the show forces her to become the narrative voice, instead of delving deeper into the societal issues at hand.

Ultimately, "Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story" exemplifies how Ryan Murphy's brand can be at odds with its own mission. While it attempts to tackle complex social issues and sheds light on the failures of law enforcement, it also perpetuates a sensationalized portrayal of Dahmer that undermines the very message it aims to convey. By prioritizing Peters' performance over the real-life victims and their families, Murphy's team sends a mixed message about what constitutes true storytelling in the context of systemic injustice.

I'm so disappointed in this new series Ryan Murphy really dropped the ball on this one The fact that they're focusing on Evan Peters' portrayal as Dahmer instead of the real-life victims and their families is just wrong It's like they're more interested in making a star out of him than actually shedding light on the systemic injustices that led to these heinous crimes And don't even get me started on how they're using the show to make Peters look good instead of really exploring the societal ills that made Dahmer who he was It's all just so... superficial

I'm so disappointed with how they handled this show . I mean, I get that Dahmer is a pretty messed up dude and all, but does it have to be humanized so much? It feels like they're more interested in making Evan Peters' performance shine than actually exploring the systemic issues that led to his crimes . And can we talk about how they're using this platform to make money off of people's suffering? I mean, I know true crime is a popular genre and all, but it feels so exploitative when you think about it. They could've done so much more with the story and the themes, but instead they just phone it in . And don't even get me started on how they're handling Glenda's character . I feel like she's being reduced to a "narrative voice" just because Evan Peters is the star of the show . It's just so... frustrating .

The whole thing just feels like a mess . Ryan Murphy is all about pushing boundaries and sparking conversations, but I feel like they took the wrong approach with this one. By focusing too much on Dahmer's humanity (and Evan Peters' performance), they watered down the real impact of his crimes. It's like they're trying to make a point, but it gets lost in the sensationalism .

I get that the show tries to highlight social issues and systemic injustice, but we need more substance over spectacle here. The victims and their families deserve better than being relegated to background characters . And what's with the "true crime" vibe? It's like they're feeding into the same culture that objectifies violence and tragedy .

I want to see more nuance, more depth, and more empathy in a story about someone as monstrous as Dahmer. We need to be critiquing the systems that allow people like him to exist, not romanticizing them .

omg u guys i just finished watchin dahmer - monster: the jeffrey dahmer story & im literally shook its like ryan murphy's team is all like "hey lets make a show thats all about systemic injustices" but then theyre also all "lets make it sexy & sensationalized w/ evan peters as dahmer lol" i get that its true crime but cmon guys, dont reduce the victims to just plot devices or characters 4 entertainment value. the whole thing feels like a mess, especially with how glenda's character is handled and honestly im not even sure what ryan murphy's ultimate goal was w/ this show did he wanna shed light on societal issues but also make a star-making role out of evan peters? its all so confusing

the way this series is handling the whole jeffrey dahmer thing feels kinda like we're being sold a watered down version of what's supposed to be a powerful exploration of systemic injustice and social critique ... like, i get that ryan murphy's team wants to humanize dahmer but at what cost? are we really gonna watch him play the role of dahmer just so we can feel bad for him instead of feeling bad for his victims and their families? it's all about the spectacle vs. substance, and honestly, it feels like we're being asked to choose between the two... or maybe it's just that we don't need more sensationalized drama about monsters when we could be having real conversations about how to prevent this kind of thing from happening in the first place

I gotta say, I'm both intrigued and disappointed by "Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story". On one hand, it's clear that Ryan Murphy's team is trying to tackle some really tough issues like systemic injustice and social critique. But on the other hand, I think they're kinda losing sight of what's important here. I mean, yeah, Evan Peters does a solid job as Dahmer, but let's not forget about the real-life victims and their families. It feels like they're getting lost in all the sensationalized drama instead of really digging into the heart of the issue.

And can we talk about how this show is perpetuating the whole "true crime" thing where we just end up consuming tragedy? Like, I get it, it's a complex topic and it's not easy to tackle, but do we really need to humanize a monster like Dahmer? It feels like they're walking a fine line between shedding light on the atrocities and perpetuating his mythos. Overall, I think they could've done more to truly shed some light on these important issues

I'm so glad they made a show about Jeffrey Dahmer, I mean who wouldn't want to watch a series about a dude who loved taxidermy and had some major issues with, you know, murder . But seriously, it's like, can't they just make the show about the victims' families or something? Instead of making Evan Peters all sympathetic and stuff. It's like, I get it, he's a talented actor and all, but let's focus on the real-life trauma instead of turning him into a star-making role .

And honestly, I'm still trying to figure out why they made Niecy Nash's character talk about not watching the show for entertainment purposes . Like, what's next? Making me feel guilty for binge-watching true crime documentaries?

I guess what I'm saying is, if Ryan Murphy wants to tackle complex social issues, he should focus on making a more nuanced show that doesn't prioritize spectacle over substance . But hey, at least it's thought-provoking... in the sense that it makes you think about how much you don't want to watch Dahmer again .

I'm so tired of these true crime shows making a buck off our darkest moments . It feels like they're more interested in entertainment value than actually exploring the deeper issues that lead to monsters like Dahmer. I mean, we get it, Evan Peters is talented and all, but can't they just focus on telling the real-life stories of those affected by Dahmer's crimes? The way he's portrayed as a sympathetic character is just wrong - shouldn't we be seeing the harm and trauma his actions caused, not being asked to root for him?

I'm so disappointed in this show, you know? I mean, Ryan Murphy is all about tackling tough issues and shedding light on social injustices, but with "Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story", he's kinda messing it up, imo . They're focusing way too much on the sensationalized stuff and not enough on the real impact of Dahmer's crimes on the families and communities affected. And Evan Peters is just so... distracting, you know? He's a great actor and all, but he's not the main focus of the show they should be. I mean, what about the victims' stories? Their families'? It feels like the show is more about making Peters look good than actually exploring the systemic issues that led to Dahmer's actions. And don't even get me started on how they're using the "true crime" genre to make us feel all emotional and invested in the story... it's just so manipulative, you know?

I'm not buying the whole "tackling complex social issues" vibe from this show . It feels like they're just trying to get more views with a "sensationalized" storyline, and now we've got Evan Peters playing the bad guy in a way that's too sympathetic for my taste . They need to focus on the real-life victims and their families instead of turning Dahmer into some kind of complex character study. And can we please talk about how weird it is to have Niecy Nash's character just narrate the whole show? Like, what even is that . I'm not saying they're not trying to make a point, but all these narrative choices just feel like they're undermining their own message to me .

I'm so disappointed with "Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story" . I mean, I get that Ryan Murphy is trying to tackle some heavy stuff, but in my opinion, they're focusing too much on making it a wild ride instead of actually saying something meaningful about the issues at hand . And Evan Peters as Dahmer? I get it, he's talented and all, but can't we just focus on the victims and their families for once? It feels like the show is more about Peters' star-making role than actual storytelling . And what's up with that whole Glenda thing? I was right there with her, "I'm not watching this for entertainment purposes" . Anyway, I guess what I'm trying to say is that the show is kinda a letdown in terms of its messaging and priorities .

I'm not sure if this series was the right move for Ryan Murphy... I mean, they were trying to tackle some heavy stuff like systemic injustice and social critique but it feels like they watered it down to make it more "watchable". The thing is, Evan Peters' portrayal of Dahmer comes across as kinda sympathetic which doesn't really align with what the show's trying to say. It's like they're trying to humanize him instead of keeping it raw and honest about how messed up his crimes were. And let's be real, it's still a pretty sensationalized take on the whole thing...

I'm so disappointed with this show, it feels like they're more interested in making a "star-making" role than actually tackling the deep issues they're trying to address . I get that Evan Peters is a talented actor and all, but does we really need him to be the center of attention? Can't they focus on telling the stories of the real-life victims and their families instead? It's like they're condoning Dahmer's actions by making him seem so...human . I wish they would have taken a more nuanced approach, one that actually sheds light on the societal ills that led to his crimes. This whole thing just feels so... messy .

I'm so frustrated with how they presented Jeffrey Dahmer's story . The show's got some great points about societal injustices & the flaws of law enforcement, but it feels like they're getting lost in trying to make the main guy likable . Evan Peters' performance is definitely a problem – it makes you feel bad for him instead of being horrified by his actions . And can we talk about how they used Glenda's character as a narrator? It feels so forced . The show's all over the place, and I wish they'd stuck to their message more.

I gotta say, this show is like a trainwreck that you can't look away from . The ratings are insane, but I'm not sure if it's because people are actually learning something or just getting hooked on the Dahmer horror vibes . On one hand, I love how the show's tackling some heavy topics like systemic injustice and societal ills - it's like they're giving us a mirror to reflect on our own complicity in these issues .

But on the other hand, Evan Peters as Dahmer feels like a total misstep . I mean, sure, he's talented and all, but does he really need to be the main focus of this show? It's like they're trying to humanize a monster instead of using him to highlight the monstrousness of our society .

And have you seen the stats on true crime consumption? Apparently, 75% of viewers are tuning in for the thrill and entertainment value, not necessarily because they're seeking social commentary or critique. It's like we've conditioned ourselves to watch these shows without actually thinking about what they're saying .

Meanwhile, the show's attempt to focus on the victims and their families is admirable, but it feels like a Band-Aid solution to a much bigger problem . The real questions being asked here are: What systemic changes can we make? How can we work towards creating a more just society? These aren't questions that Peters' performance can answer .

So yeah, I'm torn on this show. Part of me wants to keep watching because it's a masterclass in storytelling and social commentary . But another part of me is like, wait, isn't this just perpetuating the same problem we're trying to critique?

I feel like "Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story" is such a prime example of how our obsession with true crime can get in the way of actually having a meaningful conversation about societal issues . I mean, Ryan Murphy's team knows they're tackling some heavy stuff, but it feels like they're more concerned with making Evan Peters look good as Dahmer than actually shedding light on the real problems that led to all those atrocities . And don't even get me started on how the show tries to humanize Dahmer in a way that feels more exploitative than thought-provoking . I think we need shows like this to be honest about what they're trying to do and not get distracted by star power or sensationalism .

omg i just binged that show and i'm still trying to figure out what to think about it idk if its supposed to be a commentary on how society fails its people or if its just a really long drama about jeffrey dahmer anyway i felt so bad for glenda nash's character she got killed off and stuff and why did they have to make evan peters' character all sympathetic like that? cant we just focus on the real victims and their families instead of making dahmer into some kinda anti-hero?

I don't think it's fair to say Ryan Murphy's series is all bad . I mean, it's definitely not perfect, but it's trying to tackle some really heavy topics like systemic injustice and social critique. But at the same time, I can see why they might be walking a fine line between shedding light on Dahmer's crimes and perpetuating his mythos. It's like they're trying to humanize him without diminishing the harm he caused . And yeah, Evan Peters' performance as Dahmer is definitely polarizing... I think it's because we're so used to seeing him play these over-the-top characters in other shows . But seriously, I wish they'd focused more on the real-life victims and their families, instead of trying to make Dahmer a sympathetic figure .

I'm so disappointed in "Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story". I feel like Ryan Murphy's team is all about shock value & Evan Peters is just playing the same ol' dark & twisted roles. It's like they're trying to humanize a monster instead of exploring the real issues that led him down that path . The show should be focusing on the victims & their families, but instead it's all about making Dahmer relatable & likable - not cool. I'm also tired of true crime shows turning victims into characters & glazing over the harsh reality of systemic injustice . Can't they do better than that?